Home Blog Page 9

Tirzepatide Decreased The Chance Of Developing Type 2 Diabetes By 94% In Persons With Pre-Diabetes, Obesity, Or Overweight

Tirzepatide Decreased The Chance Of Developing Type 2 Diabetes By 94% In Persons With Pre-Diabetes, Obesity, Or Overweight

Indianapolis, August 20, 2024 (PRNewswire) — Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE: LLY) today announced positive topline results from the SURMOUNT-1 three-year study (176-week treatment period) evaluating the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide (Zepbound® and Mounjaro®) once weekly for long-term weight management and delayed progression to diabetes in adults with pre-diabetes, obesity, or overweight. Weekly tirzepatide injections (5 mgi, 10 mg, 15 mg) reduced the incidence of progression to type 2 diabetes by 94% ii among persons with pre-diabetes, obesity, or overweight when compared to placebo. Furthermore, treatment with tirzepatide resulted in sustained weight loss across the treatment duration. At the end of the treatment period, adults on the 15 mg dose had a 22.9% overall average drop in body weight, compared to 2.1% for placebo in adults with pre-diabetes, obesity, or overweight.

“Obesity is a chronic disease that increases the risk of other complications such as type 2 diabetes in nearly 900 million adults worldwide,” said Jeff Emmick, M.D., Ph.D., senior vice president, product development at Lilly. “Tirzepatide lowered the chance of acquiring type 2 diabetes by 94% and resulted in consistent weight loss over a three-year treatment period. These findings support the potential clinical benefits of long-term treatment for persons with obesity and pre-diabetes.”

Tirzepatide was tested in 1,032 persons with pre-diabetes at randomization and obesity or overweight for 176 weeks, followed by a 17-week off-treatment interval (193 weeks total). In 2022, the New England Journal of Medicine published the results of the SURMOUNT-1 phase 3 study’s principal analysis at 72 weeks in all participants.

Tirzepatide significantly reduced the chance of developing type 2 diabetes in persons with pre-diabetes, obesity, or overweight from baseline to week 176 (p<0.0001, adjusted for type 1 error). For the efficacy estimation, pooled dosages of tirzepatide produced significant findings. Up to week 176, it demonstrated a 94% reduction in the risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared to placebo. Up to week 176, pooled dosages of tirzepatide reduced the probability of developing type 2 diabetes by 93% compared to placebo.

Tirzepatide (10 mg and 15 mg) significantly reduced weight in persons with pre-diabetes, obesity, or overweight compared to placebo from baseline to week 176 (p<0.001, corrected for type 1 error). At week 176, adults receiving tirzepatide lost an average of 15.4% (5 mg), 19.9% (10 mg), and 22.9% (15 mg) more weight than those on placebo (2.1%).

At week 176, persons using tirzepatide lost an average of 12.3% (5 mg), 18.7% (10 mg), and 19.7% (15 mg) more weight than those taking placebo (1.3%).

During the 17-week off-treatment period, those who had discontinued tirzepatide began to gain weight and had an increase in the progression to type 2 diabetes, resulting in an 88% reduction (p<0.0001, controlled for type 1 error) in the risk of progression to type 2 diabetes compared to placebo.

The overall safety and tolerability profile of tirzepatide across the 193-week study was consistent with previously published primary outcomes at 72 weeks in SURMOUNT-1 and other tirzepatide clinical trials for chronic weight management. The most often reported adverse effects were typically gastrointestinal in nature and of mild to moderate intensity. The most common gastrointestinal side effects for tirzepatide patients were diarrhea, nausea, constipation, and vomiting.

Tirzepatide, a GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist, functions by activating both hormone receptors. GLP-1 regulates appetite and calorie intake. Nonclinical studies indicate that the inclusion of GIP may aid in the regulation of food consumption. Tirzepatide reduces calorie intake, and the effects are most likely mediated by changes in appetite. Furthermore, tirzepatide promotes insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent way. Tirzepatide improves insulin sensitivity in people with type 2 diabetes, which can lead to a drop in blood glucose levels.

These topline data show that tirzepatide reduces the chance of developing type 2 diabetes and maintains weight loss in persons with pre-diabetes, obesity, or overweight. Detailed findings will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at ObesityWeek 2024, which will be held November 3–6.

About SURMOUNT-1

SURMOUNT-1 (NCT04184622) was a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled trial that compared the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide 5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg to placebo as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity in adults without type 2 diabetes who are obese or overweight and have at least one of the following comorbidities: hypertension, dyslipidemia, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), or cardiovascular disease. The 1,032 participants who had pre-diabetes at the start of the study remained enrolled in SURMOUNT-1 for an additional 104 weeks of treatment after the initial 72-week completion date to assess the impact on body weight and potential differences in progression to type 2 diabetes after three years of treatment with tirzepatide versus placebo.

About Tirzepatide

Tirzepatide is an agonist of the GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) and GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) receptors that is administered once weekly. Tirzepatide is a single molecule that stimulates the body’s GIP and GLP-1 receptors, which are naturally occurring incretin hormones. GIP and GLP-1 receptors are present in parts of the brain that regulate hunger. Tirzepatide has been demonstrated to reduce food intake while modulating fat utilization. Tirazepatide is also being studied for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and morbidity and mortality in obesity (MMO). Lilly submitted data on tirzepatide in moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and obesity to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other global regulatory agencies earlier this year. Lilly intends to provide statistics for Earlier this year, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other global regulatory bodies approved tirzepatide for the treatment of moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and obesity. Lilly intends to submit data on tirzepatide in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and obesity to the US FDA and other worldwide regulatory agencies later this year.

Tirzepatide was approved by the FDA as Mounjaro® for adults with type 2 diabetes to improve glycemic control on May 13, 2022, and as Zepbound® for adults with obesity (a BMI of 30 kg/m2 or greater) or overweight (a BMI of 27 kg/m2 or greater) and a weight-related comorbid condition on November 8, 2023. Tirzepatide is also sold as Mounjaro® in select global markets outside the United States to individuals who are obese or overweight and have a weight-related comorbid condition.

Tirzepatide is the only approved GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) and GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) therapy for persistent obesity. Mounjaro® and Zepbound® should be used in combination with a healthy diet and regular exercise.

INDICATION AND SAFETY SUMMARY, WITH WARNINGS

Zepbound® (ZEHP-bownd) is an injectable prescription drug that may help adults who are obese or have excess weight (overweight) and have weight-related medical problems reduce and maintain their weight. It should be combined with a lower-calorie diet and more physical activity.

Zepbound contains tirzepatide, which should not be combined with other tirzepatide-containing drugs or GLP-1 receptor-agonist medications. It is unclear whether Zepbound is safe and effective when combined with other prescription, over-the-counter, or herbal weight-loss medications. It is unclear whether Zepbound can be used in patients who have experienced pancreatitis. It is unclear whether Zepbound is safe and effective for use by children under the age of 18.

Warnings: Zepbound may cause thyroid tumors, including cancer. Look for signs of a lump or enlargement in the neck, hoarseness, difficulty swallowing, or shortness of breath. If you have any of these symptoms, contact your doctor.

Do not use Zepbound if you or anybody in your family has ever had medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC).
Zepbound should not be used if you have Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Syndrome type 2 (MEN 2).
Do not use Zepbound if you have experienced a severe allergic response to tirzepatide or any of its constituents.

Zepbound may have major side effects, such as:

Severe stomach issues. People who take Zepbound have reported stomach problems, some of which are severe. Tell your doctor if you experience serious stomach troubles that won’t go away.

Kidney troubles (failure). Diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting may induce fluid loss (dehydration), which can lead to renal problems. You should drink enough fluids to lower your chances of becoming dehydrated.

Gallbladder issues. Some Zepbound users have reported gallbladder troubles. If you have gallbladder symptoms such as pain in your upper stomach (abdomen), fever, yellowing of the skin or eyes (jaundice), or clay-colored feces, see your doctor right away.

Pancreatic inflammation. Stop using Zepbound and contact your doctor right away if you have severe stomach discomfort (abdomen) that does not go away, with or without vomiting. You may experience pain across your abdomen and back.

Severe allergic responses. Stop using Zepbound and seek medical attention right away if you experience any of the following symptoms of a significant allergic reaction: swelling of your face, lips, tongue, or throat, difficulty breathing or swallowing, severe rash or itching, fainting or feeling dizzy, or a very rapid heartbeat.

Hypoglycemia (low blood sugar). If you combine Zepbound with other blood sugar-lowering medications, such as sulfonylureas or insulin, your chance of developing low blood sugar may increase. Low blood sugar symptoms may include dizziness or lightheadedness, perspiration, confusion or sleepiness, headache, blurred vision, slurred speech, shakiness, rapid heartbeat, anxiety, irritability, mood changes, hunger, weakness, or jitteriness.

Vision changes in people with type 2 diabetes. If your vision changes while using Zepbound, notify your healthcare professional.

Depression or suicidal ideation. Pay attention to changes in your mood, behavior, sensations, or thoughts. If you see any new, worsening, or concerning mental changes, contact your healthcare practitioner immediately.

Common Side Effects

Zepbound’s most common side effects are nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, constipation, stomach (abdominal) pain, indigestion, injection site responses, fatigue, allergic reactions, belching, hair loss, and heartburn. These are not the only probable negative effects of Zepbound. Inform your healthcare practitioner if you are experiencing any side effects that are bothering you or are persistent.

Inform your healthcare practitioner if you experience any side effects. To report side effects, call 1-800-FDA-1088 or visit www.fda.gov/medwatch.

Before using Zepbound,.

Before you begin using Zepbound for the first time, your healthcare provider should demonstrate how to do so.

Tell your doctor if you are using any diabetes medications, such as insulin or sulfonylureas, which may raise your risk of low blood sugar. Consult your healthcare professional about low blood sugar levels and how to manage them.
If you take birth control tablets orally, see your doctor before using Zepbound. Birth control pills may not be as effective while taking Zepbound. Your healthcare practitioner may advise you to use a different method of birth control for the first four weeks after starting Zepbound and for each subsequent four-week dose increase.
Discuss these questions with your healthcare provider:

  • Do you have other medical illnesses, including problems with your pancreas or kidneys, or serious problems with your stomach, such as sluggish emptying (gastroparesis) or trouble digesting food?
  • Do you use diabetes medications, like insulin or sulfonylureas?
  • Have you ever had diabetic retinopathy?
  • Do you take any additional prescription or over-the-counter medications, vitamins, or herbal supplements?
  • Are you pregnant, planning to get pregnant, breastfeeding, or intending to breastfeed? Zepbound may harm your unborn child. Inform your healthcare provider if you become pregnant while taking Zepbound. It is unknown whether Zepbound goes into your breast milk. You should consult your healthcare professional about the best way to feed your infant while on Zepbound.

Pregnancy Exposure Registry: A pregnancy exposure registry will be established for women who took Zepbound during their pregnancy. This registry’s objective is to collect health-related information about you and your baby. Talk to your doctor about how you can participate in this registry, or call Lilly at 1-800-LillyRx (1-800-545-5979).

How To Take

Read the Zepbound instructions.

Follow the instructions provided by your healthcare professional when using Zepbound.

Zepbound is injected subcutaneously into your stomach, thigh, or upper arm.

Use Zepbound once each week, at any time of day.
Change (rotate) your injection site every week. Do not inject at the same place each time.

If you take too much Zepbound, call your doctor immediately, get medical help, or contact a Poison Center expert at 1-800-222-1222.
Learn more.

Zepbound is a prescription medication. For additional information, call 1-800-LillyRx (1-800-545-5979) or visit www.zepbound.lilly.com.

This overview gives basic information about Zepbound but may not include all of the information available about this medication. Read the information that comes with your medication every time it is filled. This material is not intended to replace a conversation with your healthcare provider. Consult your healthcare professional about Zepbound and how to take it. Your healthcare practitioner is the best person to help you determine whether Zepbound is suitable for you.

ZP CON CBS 08 November 2023.

Eli Lilly and Company, its subsidiaries, and affiliates own or license the registered trademarks Zepbound® and its delivery device foundation.

INDICATION AND SAFETY SUMMARY, WITH WARNINGS

Mounjaro® (pronounced mown-JAHR-OH) is an injectable drug for adults with type 2 diabetes that is used in conjunction with diet and exercise to improve blood sugar levels.

It is unclear whether Mounjaro can be utilized in people who have suffered pancreatic inflammation. Mounjaro is not recommended for patients with type 1 diabetes. It is unclear whether Mounjaro is safe and effective for use by children under the age of 18.

Warnings: Mounjaro may cause thyroid tumors, including thyroid cancer. Look for signs of a lump or enlargement in the neck, hoarseness, difficulty swallowing, or shortness of breath. If you have any of these symptoms, contact your doctor.

Do not take Mounjaro if you or anybody in your family has had medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC).
Mounjaro should not be used if you have Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Syndrome type 2 (MEN 2).
Do not use Mounjaro if you have an allergy to it or any of its ingredients.

Mounjaro may have major negative effects, such as:

Pancreatic inflammation. Stop using Mounjaro and contact your doctor right away if you have severe stomach discomfort (abdomen) that does not go away, with or without vomiting. You may experience pain across your abdomen and back.

Hypoglycemia (low blood sugar). If you use Mounjaro with another blood sugar-lowering medication, such as a sulfonylurea or insulin, your chances of developing low blood sugar may increase. Low blood sugar symptoms may include dizziness or lightheadedness, perspiration, confusion or sleepiness, headache, blurred vision, slurred speech, shakiness, rapid heartbeat, anxiety, irritability, or mood swings, hunger, weakness, and jitteriness.

Severe allergic responses. Stop taking Mounjaro and get medical attention right away if you experience any of the following symptoms of a significant allergic reaction: swelling of your face, lips, tongue, or throat; difficulty breathing or swallowing; severe rash or itching; fainting or feeling disoriented; and a very rapid heartbeat.

Kidney troubles (failure). Diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting can induce fluid loss (dehydration) in people with kidney difficulties, exacerbating the condition. You should drink enough fluids to lower your chances of becoming dehydrated.

Severe stomach issues. People who use Mounjaro have reported stomach problems, some of which are serious. Tell your doctor if you experience serious stomach troubles that won’t go away.

Changes in vision. If your vision changes while taking Mounjaro, notify your healthcare provider.

Gallbladder issues. Some Mounjaro users have reported gallbladder troubles. If you experience symptoms of gallbladder difficulties, such as pain in your upper stomach (abdomen), fever, yellowing of the skin or eyes (jaundice), or clay-colored feces, see your doctor immediately.

Common side effects

The most common Mounjaro side effects are nausea, diarrhea, decreased appetite, vomiting, constipation, indigestion, and stomach discomfort. These aren’t the only probable Mounjaro side effects. Inform your healthcare practitioner if you are experiencing any side effects that are bothering you or are persistent.

Inform your healthcare practitioner if you experience any side effects. To report side effects, call 1-800-FDA-1088 or visit www.fda.gov/medwatch.

Before using Mounjaro:

Before you begin using Mounjaro for the first time, your healthcare provider should demonstrate how to use it.
Consult your healthcare professional about low blood sugar and how to treat it.
If you take birth control tablets orally, see your doctor before using Mounjaro. Birth control pills may not be as effective while taking Mounjaro. Your healthcare practitioner may advise you to use another method of birth control for the first four weeks after starting Mounjaro and for each subsequent four-week increase in dose.

Discuss these questions with your healthcare provider:

  • Do you have other medical conditions, such as problems with your pancreas or kidneys, or serious stomach problems, such as sluggish emptying (gastroparesis) or difficulty digesting food?
  • Do you take any other diabetes medications, like insulin or sulfonylurea?
  • Have you ever had diabetic retinopathy?
  • Are you pregnant, planning to get pregnant, breastfeeding, or intending to breastfeed? It is unclear whether Mounjaro will harm your unborn child or pass into your breast milk.
  • Do you take any additional prescription or over-the-counter medications, vitamins, or herbal supplements?

How To Take
Read Mounjaro’s instructions for use.

Follow the instructions provided by your healthcare professional when using Mounjaro.
Mounjaro is injected subcutaneously into your stomach, thigh, or upper arm.
Use Mounjaro once every week, at any time of day.
Do not combine insulin with Mounjaro in the same injection.
You can inject Mounjaro and insulin in the same body location (such as your stomach), but not exactly next to each other.
Change (rotate) your injection site every week. Do not inject at the same place each time.
If you consume too much Mounjaro, contact your healthcare professional or seek medical assistance immediately.
Learn more.

Mounjaro is a prescription medication. For additional information, call 1-833-807-MJRO (833-807-6576) or visit www.mounjaro.com.

This overview includes basic information about Mounjaro but does not cover all of the available information regarding this drug. Read the information that comes with your medication every time it is filled. This material is not intended to replace a conversation with your healthcare provider. Consult your healthcare practitioner about Mounjaro and how to take it. Your healthcare practitioner is the best person to advise you on whether Mounjaro is a good fit for you.

TR CON CBS, 14SEP2022.

Eli Lilly and Company, its subsidiaries, and affiliates own or license the registered trademarks Mounjaro® and its delivery device foundation.

About Lilly

Lilly is a medical company that transforms knowledge into therapy to improve people’s lives all over the world. We’ve been pioneering life-changing discoveries for nearly 150 years, and our medications now benefit over 51 million people worldwide. Our scientists are urgently advancing new discoveries to solve some of the world’s most significant health challenges: redefining diabetes care; treating obesity and reducing its most devastating long-term effects; advancing the fight against Alzheimer’s disease; providing solutions to some of the most debilitating immune system disorders; and transforming the most difficult-to-treat cancers into With each stride toward a healthier world, we are inspired by one goal: to improve the lives of millions of people. This means conducting creative clinical studies that reflect our world’s diversity, as well as aiming to make our medications more accessible and cheap. For additional information, please visit Lilly.com and Lilly.com/news, or follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn. P-LLY.

I did not control for type 1 errors.

ii The efficacy estimand represents efficacy if all patients stayed on randomized treatment for the entire scheduled term (up to 176 weeks).
iii The treatment-regimen estimand represents efficacy regardless of adherence to the randomized treatment.

Cautionary Statement About Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements (as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995), including statements about tirzepatide injection for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes, tirzepatide as a potential long-term therapy for adults with pre-diabetes, obesity, or overweight, and the timeline for future presentations and other milestones relating to tirzepatide and its clinical trials, and reflects Lilly’s current However, like with any pharmaceutical product, there are significant risks and uncertainties during the research and development and commercialization phases. Among other things, there can be no guarantee that planned or ongoing investigations will be completed as planned or that future study results will be consistent with the outcomes so far. that tirzepatide will get more regulatory clearances or that it will be commercially successful. For a more in-depth discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties, please see Lilly’s most recent Form 10-K and Form 10-Q filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as required by law, Lilly has no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events occurring after the date of this release.

NHS Prosthetics Hold Athletes Back. – Paralympian

NHS Prosthetics Hold Athletes Back. – Paralympian

A reigning Paralympic champion has told BBC News that NHS prostheses must improve to generate Great Britain’s “next generation” of gold medalists.

Speaking prior to the Paris Paralympics, runner Richard Whitehead stated that the prosthetics were “not fit for purpose” since they did not allow for a full range of motion and could cause discomfort and skin irritation while running.

The NHS does not typically supply sports prostheses, often known as activity limbs, to adults.
According to NHS England, many fitness and physical activities can be done without using a sports-specific prosthetic.

Whitehead, a double-above-the-knee amputee who specializes in marathon running, has won several world championships. He is also the proud recipient of two Paralympic gold medals for significantly shorter distances, which he raced in because there was no marathon for his disability group.

The numerous physical and mental benefits motivate him to see more amputees participate in sports.

“I want to see a lot more young people running around [and] climbing trees in sports prosthetics, in running blades—I don’t see them,” he said to the BBC.

“It’s not a special occasion” in the United States for someone with a prosthetic to run a marathon, Whitehead said.

However, in the United Kingdom, where hurdles to involvement in sport included a lack of equipment and exorbitant expenses, it remained.
Lower-limb prostheses can range in price from £1,000 to more than £50,000.

A government fund established in 2017 allows any eligible child to acquire a sports prosthetic from their local NHS England limb centre.

However, after the age of 18, this financing is discontinued, and patients now obtain prescription-based NHS walking limbs tailored to their specific needs, which is why they frequently abandon sports, according to Whitehead.

NHS prescriptions were “restrictive,” and some patients were even urged to limit their physical activity so they wouldn’t outgrow their prosthesis.

Jamie Gane, the world’s top para-obstacle course racer, got a below-the-knee amputation in 2016, but it took some time to receive the correct prosthetics to begin his journey into elite sport.
Soon after his amputation, Gane was given an NHS-prescribed prosthetic foot, which he described as “useless” since it was too difficult to walk on.

He paid to have a prosthetic limb fitted privately so he could use the gym and eventually start running while he waited for another surgery, which would have taken 18 months.
Gane was given an NHS limb appropriate for his level of fitness after demonstrating that he would use it for sport, but he claims it did not provide him with the range of mobility he required.
“I could probably do a couple of parkruns and a little bit of sport, but nowhere near the level that I do now,” according to him.

However, according to David Rose of the Limbless Association charity, advances in technology and increased money mean that the NHS prosthetics program is already helping patients achieve more “than it did even five to ten years ago.”

Mr. Rose has been equipped with multiple NHS prosthetics after losing his leg 45 years ago.
For most of his life, he was an avid cricketer, and he claims that practicing sports was the only thing that kept him going.

And, while he agrees with Whitehead, “we have to make the best of what we have.”.
Walid Saleh, 26, a single-leg amputee since he was a youth, was motivated by Whitehead’s 200-meter gold medal at the London Paralympics.

And Whitehead’s philanthropic foundation is now assisting him in his own dream of competing in the 2028 Los Angeles Paralympics by equipping him with his first running limbs.

However, Saleh believes that being an athlete is about more than just winning and collecting gold medals and that becoming more active has improved his mental health.
“The running blades allow me to overcome my disability,” he said.
As the 2024 Paralympics begin, Whitehead hopes his foundation will inspire the next generation.
However, he continued: “To have the next generation of Paralympic athletes and gold medallists, we need to make a change, and that change needs to start with the NHS really believing what is best for the patients.”

According to an NHS England spokesman, the NHS provides a variety of prosthetics to people who have lost limbs, and many fitness and physical activities can be done without a sports-specific prosthetic.

Healthcare practitioners assessed a variety of factors when determining whether patients would benefit from prosthetics or adjustments to aid in fitness and physical activities, including whether patients had a history of activity and were fit enough to utilize them, according to the official.

Taylor Swift Breaks The Wembley Stadium Record As Her UK Tour Comes To A Conclusion

Taylor Swift Breaks The Wembley Stadium Record As Her UK Tour Comes To A Conclusion

Taylor Swift wrapped up the European leg of her Eras Tour with a record-breaking performance at Wembley Stadium that was full of surprises.

The pop queen was joined on stage by Florence + The Machine and Bleachers frontman Jack Antonoff, who rewarded fans with the debut of a new music video and the first live performance of her song So Long, London.

It was Swift’s sixth concert at Wembley this summer, breaking Michael Jackson’s Bad Tour record from 1988.

“You just made me the first solo artist to ever play Wembley eight times in a single tour,” she told her supporters. “We will never, ever be able to thank you enough for it.”

The star’s eighth Wembley gig also saw her equal the overall record for the most nights at the facility on a single tour, which was previously held by Take That on their Progress Tour in 2011.
‘This is the best.’

The star’s headline-grabbing tour has crisscrossed Europe this summer, with the Wembley finale marking the 131st leg in her two-year journey.

In the United Kingdom alone, she performed for about 1.2 million people, generating an estimated £1 billion for the country’s economy.

A team of geophysicists in Edinburgh even recorded seismic waves caused by people dancing at Murrayfield Stadium, causing the earth to move by a maximum of 23.4 nanometres (nm) during the song Ready For It?

The London performances were a high point, with Swift performing there more than any other city on her tour.

“I’ve always loved playing for you here in London, but this is the best,” she remarked during Tuesday’s final show.
“I’ve never had it so amazing before. “I’ve never had a crowd that generous.”You appear to have memorised every single phrase to every single song, which is a dream come true.”

She made the final show count by bringing out Florence Welch of Florence & The Machine for a duet on the song Florida!!!

The British singer’s presence elicited a wave of shouts as the two stars stood face-to-face, roaring the chorus at each other at the end of a catwalk.

But any loyal Swiftie knows that the real highlight of the Eras Tour is the acoustic performance, where she performs two “surprise songs” that aren’t on the schedule.

Last week, Ed Sheeran joined the singer to perform Endgame and Thinking Out Loud.
Jack Antonoff, one of her key collaborators on Grammy-winning albums such as Folklore and Midnights, accompanied her on her final date at Wembley.

They performed a guitar-based medley of Death Thousand Cuts and Getaway Car By.
To fans’ pleasure, the duo conducted a silly reenactment of the Getaway Car recording session, during which they wrote the song’s bridge in a 30-second flash of inspiration.

So Long, London. I Played For The First Time

Swift then continued her acoustic set at the piano, performing the live debut of So Long, London from her most recent album, The Tortured Poets Department.

Fans have been guessing for days whether she will play the song, which is popularly believed to be about her breakup with British actor Joe Alwyn last year.

The couple was thought to have resided in Primrose Hill during the pandemic, and Swift had previously composed a song called London Boy in his honor.

However, the six-year romance ended last year, a month after Swift launched her Eras Tour in North America.

On So Long, London, she sings about the end of a London-based affair: “You left me at the house by the Heath…” And I’m upset that you let me give you all that youth for nothing.

But The Surprises Did Not Stop With The Acoustic Set

After the three-and-a-half-hour event, Swift exited the stage and played a brand new music video on the stadium’s large screens as people began to leave.

Featuring brand new behind-the-scenes footage, it provided an insight into the immense size of the Eras tour, with Swift traveling under the stage on train tracks and performing the ambitious “stage dive” that has become a concert highlight.

The video was accompanied by I Can Do It With A Broken Heart, a highlight of her most recent album that describes how the first leg of her tour was overshadowed by the emotional impact of her breakup with Alwyn.

“All the pieces of me shattered as the crowd was chanting ‘More’,” she says in the pre-chorus.

This summer’s shows, however, have been set against a much more somber backdrop.
On July 29, three young girls were killed in a horrific incident during a Taylor Swift-themed dancing lesson in Southport.

A few weeks later, the artist was forced to cancel three shows in Vienna after security prevented a possible attack on her fans at the Ernst Happel Stadium.

Swift is said to have personally reached out to the victims of the Southport stabbing, releasing a statement stating she was “at a complete loss for how to ever convey my sympathies to these families.”.

However, she has not mentioned either incident on stage, choosing to focus on the sense of community that has become the Eras tour’s distinguishing feature, with fans exchanging friendship bracelets and making new friendships every night.

The tour has even generated a spreadsheet-based side business, recording every outfit variation and surprise song played along the way.

The show’s characters are so familiar to Swift fans that they now join in with her written stage name (“Welcome to the Eras Tour!”) as frequently as her song lyrics.

It gives a sense of camp to the proceedings, like a sanitized pop remix of the Rocky Horror Picture Show.

Swift soaked up the praise on stage at Wembley Stadium, calling it “a privilege to do the thing I love in front of any size crowd at all.”.

At a previous event in Liverpool, she had similarly described the Eras Tour as the “most exhausting, all-encompassing, but most joyful, rewarding, and wonderful thing that has ever happened in my life.”.

The 34-year-old will now take a well-deserved break before resuming the tour for one final trip throughout the United States and Canada in the fall.

When it reaches its last date in Vancouver in December, it will have earned an estimated $2 billion in ticket sales alone.

Without a doubt, it will make it the largest tour of all time, with revenues more than double Elton John’s farewell tour, which held the previous record.

The major question is, what will Swift do then?

Power, Oil, And A $450 Million Painting: Insiders On Saudi Crown Prince’s Rise

Power, Oil, And A $450 Million Painting: Insiders On Saudi Crown Prince’s Rise

In January 2015, Saudi King Abdullah, 90, was dying in the hospital. His half-brother, Salman, was set to become king, and Salman’s favorite son, Mohammed bin Salman, was gearing up for power.

The prince, known only by his initials MBS and only 29 years old at the time, had grand aspirations for his kingdom, the most ambitious in its history, but he was concerned that plotters within his own Saudi royal family would someday turn against him. So, at midnight one evening that month, he summoned a senior security official to the palace, intending to gain his trust.

The official, Saad al-Jabri, was instructed to place his phone on a table outside. MBS did the same. The two men were now alone. The young prince was so concerned about palace spies that he removed the connection from the wall, disconnecting the single landline telephone.
According to Jabri, MBS then discussed how he planned to awaken his kingdom from its profound slumber and restore it to its rightful place on the global scene. By selling a part in Aramco, the world’s most successful oil business, he would begin to wean his economy off oil. He would spend billions of dollars in Silicon Valley digital businesses, notably the cab company Uber. Then, by allowing Saudi women to work, he plans to create six million additional jobs.
Jabri was taken aback by the prince’s goal and inquired about it. “Have you heard of Alexander the Great?” was the simple response.

MBS concluded the chat there. A midnight meeting that was supposed to last half an hour had gone on for three. Jabri left the room to find several missed calls on his phone from government colleagues concerned about his prolonged absence.

Kingdom: The World’s Most Powerful Prince

The incredible rise to power of the man who leads Saudi Arabia and has control over oil impacts everyone, beginning with how he outwitted hundreds of rivals to become crown prince.

For the past year, our documentary crew has spoken with both Saudi fans and opponents of MBS, as well as senior Western spies and diplomats. The Saudi government was given the opportunity to reply to the allegations presented in the BBC documentaries and this article. They decided not to do so.

Saad al-Jabri held such high positions in the Saudi security system that he was acquainted with the directors of the CIA and MI6. While the Saudi government has labeled Jabri a discredited former official, he is also the most well-informed Saudi dissident to have dared to speak out about how the crown prince governs Saudi Arabia, and the rare interview he has given us is stunning in its complexity.

By speaking with numerous people who know the prince personally, we were able to shed new light on the events that have made MBS famous, including the 2018 murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi and the start of a disastrous war in Yemen.

With his father becoming increasingly ailing, MBS, 38, is now de facto in charge of Islam’s birthplace and the world’s largest oil exporter. He has begun to carry out many of the ground-breaking initiatives he revealed to Saad al-Jabri, but he is also being accused of human rights violations, including free speech suppression, extensive use of the death sentence, and the imprisonment of female rights advocates.

Not A Good Start

The first monarch of Saudi Arabia had at least 42 sons, including MBS’ father, Salman. The crown has traditionally been passed down among these sons. Salman was raised to the line of succession after two of them died unexpectedly in 2011 and 2012.

Western espionage services make it their job to investigate the Saudi counterpart of Kremlinology: determining who will be the next king. At this point, MBS was so young and unknown that he wasn’t even on their radar.

“He grew up in relative obscurity,” recalls Sir John Sawers, the MI6 chief until 2014. “He wasn’t earmarked to rise to power.”

The crown prince also grew up in a palace where bad behavior had few, if any, consequences, and this may explain his well-known habit of not considering the ramifications of his decisions until after they had been taken.

MBS first rose to prominence in Riyadh in his late teens, when he was dubbed “Abu Rasasa” or “Father of the Bullet” for allegedly sending a gunshot in the mail to a court that overruled him in a property dispute.

“He has had a certain ruthlessness,” observed Sir John Sawers. “He does not appreciate being crossed. However, this also means that he has been able to implement changes that no other Saudi leader has been able to do.

Among the most welcome developments, according to the former MI6 chief, is the cessation of Saudi assistance to mosques and religious schools abroad, which have become breeding grounds for

Islamist jihadism, which has a significant benefit to Western security

MBS’s mother, Fahda, is a Bedouin tribeswoman and is regarded as the favorite among his father’s four marriages. Western diplomats say the king has long suffered from a slow-onset form of vascular dementia, and MBS was the son he looked to for assistance.
Several diplomats told us about their contacts with MBS and his father. The prince would compose notes on an iPad and send them to his father’s iPad to help him figure out what to say next.

BBC Sounds: Is Mohammed Bin Salman The Unstoppable Prince?

The prince was reputedly so eager for his father to become king that in 2014, he allegedly suggested murdering the then-monarch, Abdullah, his uncle, with a poisoned ring bought from Russia.

“I don’t know for sure if he was just bragging, but we took it seriously,” Jabri tells me. The former top security official claims he saw secretly recorded surveillance footage of MBS discussing the concept. “He was banned from court, from shaking hands with the king, for a considerable amount of time.”

In the end, the monarch died of natural causes, allowing his brother Salman to take the throne in 2015. MBS was named Defense Minister and promptly declared war.
War in Yemen

Two months later, the prince led a Gulf coalition to war against the Houthi movement, which had taken control of much of western Yemen and was viewed as a proxy for Saudi Arabia’s regional adversary Iran. It sparked a humanitarian calamity, putting millions on the verge of starvation.
“It wasn’t a clever decision,” admits Sir John Jenkins, the British ambassador, shortly before the war began. “One senior American military commander told me they had been given 12 hours’ notice of the campaign, which is unheard of.”

The military battle helped a little-known prince become a Saudi national hero. However, it was the first of what his friends perceive to be several catastrophic blunders.

A repeating pattern of behavior emerged: MBS’s preference for acting unpredictably or on impulse over the usually sluggish and collegiate structure of Saudi decision-making, as well as his refusal to grovel to the US or be considered the head of a backward client state.
Jabri goes far further, accusing MBS of forging his father’s  signature on a royal edict authorizing ground forces.

Jabri claims he addressed the Yemen war in the White House before it began and that Susan Rice, President Obama’s National Security Advisor, informed him that the US would only support an air campaign.

However, Jabri alleges MBS was so determined to push forward in Yemen that he ignored the Americans.

“We were surprised that there was a royal decree to allow the ground interventions,” Jabri tells me. “He falsified his father’s signature for the royal proclamation. The king’s cognitive abilities were failing.”

Jabri claims his source for this allegation was “credible, reliable,” and connected to the Ministry of Interior, where he was chief of staff.

Jabri recalls the CIA station head in Riyadh telling him how unhappy he was that MBS had ignored the Americans and that the attack on Yemen should never have occurred.

Sir John Sawers, the former MI6 chief, believes that while he does not know whether MBS fabricated the documents, “it is clear that this was MBS’s decision to intervene militarily in Yemen.” It wasn’t his father’s decision, but his father was carried along with it.”
We discovered that MBS saw himself as an outcast from the start, a young man with a lot to prove and a refusal to follow anyone’s rules but his own.

Kirsten Fontenrose, a member of President Donald Trump’s National Security Council, believes the CIA’s in-house psychological profile of the prince misses the point.

“There were no prototypes to base him on,” she informs me. “He had boundless resources. He’s never been told ‘no’. He is the first youthful leader to represent a generation that most of us in government are too old to understand.”

Creating His Own Rules

MBS’s 2017 purchase of a famous painting reveals a lot about his thinking and readiness to take risks, unafraid to deviate from the religiously strict culture he leads. Above all, he was intended to outplay the West through showy shows of might.

In 2017, a Saudi prince apparently operating for MBS paid $450 million (£350 million) for the Salvator Mundi, which remains the world’s most expensive work of art ever sold. Leonardo da Vinci is said to have created the painting, which represents Jesus Christ as the master of heaven and earth, as well as the world’s saviour. It has been missing for about seven years, since the auction.

According to Bernard Haykel, a friend of the crown prince and Professor of Near Eastern Studies at Princeton University, despite rumors that it hangs in the prince’s yacht or palace, the painting is actually in storage in Geneva, and MBS intends to hang it in an unfinished museum in the Saudi capital.

“I want to build a very large museum in Riyadh,” MBS told Haykel. “And I want an anchor object that will attract people, just like the Mona Lisa does.”
Similarly, his ideas for sports show someone who is both ambitious and willing to challenge the status quo.

Saudi Arabia’s unprecedented spending spree on world-class sport—it is the sole bidder to host the FIFA World Cup in 2034 and has made multimillion-dollar expenditures in organizing tennis and golf tournaments—has been dubbed “sportswashing.”. But what we discovered is a leader who cares less about what the West thinks of him and more about demonstrating the opposite: that he will do whatever he wants to make himself and Saudi Arabia successful.

“MBS is interested in building his own power as a leader,” says Sir John Sawers, a former MI6 chief who has met with him. “The only way he can do it is to increase his country’s might. That’s what drives him.”

Jabri’s 40-year career as a Saudi official ended as MBS consolidated power. Chief of staff for former Crown Prince Muhammed bin Nayef, he fled the country when MBS took control after being warned by a foreign intelligence service that he was in danger. But Jabri claims MBS texted him out of the blue, offering him his old job back.

“It was bait, and I didn’t bite,” Jabri adds, confident that returning would have resulted in torture, imprisonment, or death. As it was, his adolescent children, Omar and Sarah, were apprehended and eventually imprisoned for money laundering and attempting to flee, allegations they reject. The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention has demanded their release.

“He planned for my assassination,” Jabri alleges. “He will not rest until he sees me dead; I have no doubt about that.”

Saudi officials have unsuccessfully requested Jabri’s extradition from Canada through Interpol. They believe he was wanted for billions of dollars in corruption while at the Interior Ministry. However, he was promoted to major general and recognized by the CIA and MI6 for preventing al-Qaeda terrorist attacks.

Khashoggi Was Killed

The murder of Jamal Khashoggi at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in 2018 implicates MBS in ways that are difficult to reject. The 15-man hit team was traveling on official passports and comprised some of MBS’s personal bodyguards. Khashoggi’s body has never been located, and it is thought to have been chopped into pieces with a bone saw.

Professor Haykel exchanged WhatsApp chats with MBS shortly after the assassination. “I was wondering, ‘How could this happen?'” Haykel says. “I believe he was deeply shocked. He had no idea the reaction to this would be so intense.”

Dennis Ross, a seasoned US ambassador, met MBS shortly afterwards. “He said he didn’t do it and that it was a colossal blunder,” Ross claims. “I certainly wanted to believe him, because I couldn’t believe that he could authorise something [like] that.”

MBS has long denied knowledge of the conspiracy, yet in 2019, he stated that he accepted “responsibility” because the crime occurred under his watch. A declassified US intelligence report revealed in February 2021 claimed that he was involved in the murder of Khashoggi.
I questioned individuals who know MBS intimately if he had learned from his blunders or if surviving the Khashoggi incident had emboldened him.

He’s learnt his lessons the hard way,” says Professor Haykel, who adds that MBS resents the case being used against him and his country but that a death like Khashoggi’s would never happen again.

Sir John Sawers hesitantly agrees that the murder marked a watershed moment. “I believe he’s learned some things. However, the personality remains the same.
His father, King Salman, is now 88. When he dies, MBS may rule Saudi Arabia for another 50 years.

However, he has recently revealed that he fears being killed, potentially as a result of his attempts to normalize Saudi-Israeli relations.

“I think there are lots of people who want to kill him,” adds Professor Haykel, “and he knows it.”

Eternal vigilance is what protects a man like MBS. It was what Saad al-Jabri saw at the start of the prince’s climb to power when he ripped the telephone socket out of the wall before conversing with him in his palace.

MBS is still a man on a mission to modernise his country in ways that his predecessors would never have attempted. However, he is hardly the first dictator to run the risk of becoming so brutal that no one dares to stop him from making more blunders.

Jonathan Rugman is a consultant producer for The Kingdom: The World’s Most Powerful Prince.

Top Image: Getty Images

BBC InDepth is the new website and app destination for the best insight and knowledge from our top journalists. Under a distinctive new brand, we’ll bring you fresh viewpoints that challenge assumptions, as well as in-depth reporting on the most pressing issues, to help you make sense of a complex world. We’ll also be displaying thought-provoking stuff from BBC Sounds and iPlayer. We’re beginning small but thinking big, and we’d want to hear your thoughts. Please send us feedback by using the button below.

The FDA Approved Two Revised COVID Vaccinations

The FDA Approved Two Revised COVID Vaccinations

On Thursday, the Food and Drug Administration approved two revised COVID-19 vaccinations to help individuals defend themselves from the virus’s latest strains.

The new COVID vaccines are intended to keep vaccinations up to date with the virus, which is constantly changing, to avoid damaging our immune systems.

“Vaccination continues to be the cornerstone of COVID-19 prevention,” stated Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, in an announcement. “These revised vaccines fulfill the agency’s strict scientific requirements for safety, efficacy, and manufacturing quality. Given the population’s diminishing immunity from previous viral infection and vaccination, we highly recommend that those who are eligible receive an updated COVID-19 vaccine to provide improved protection against presently circulating strains.”

The Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines, approved on Thursday, target the KP.2 variation. The Novavax vaccine, which is based on an older technology, targets an earlier strain known as JN.1 and is also likely to receive FDA approval soon.

Even If The Vaccine Is Not Flawless, It Can Still Provide Protection

Both target strains have already been surpassed by newer varieties, but they are all still members of the omicron group. The vaccines are hoped to be close enough to enhance immunity and protect people through the remainder of the surprisingly large summer wave and the projected surge this winter.

“The vaccination isn’t meant to be perfect. “It will not completely prevent COVID-19,” Marks told NPR in an interview. “But if we can prevent people from getting serious cases that end up in emergency rooms, hospitals or worse — dead — that’s what we’re trying to do with these vaccines.”

Marks estimates that the new vaccines will reduce the risk of contracting COVID by 60% to 70% and the probability of becoming extremely ill by 80% to 90%. The shots are planned to be accessible to those aged 6 months and up as early as this weekend.

Vaccine timing may be a personal decision
“Right now we’re in a wave, so you’d like to get protection against what’s going on right now,” Marks tells me. “So, I would probably be vaccinated as soon as feasible. Because the match is currently pretty close. This vaccine will most likely provide you with the greatest benefit compared to what is currently circulating. So, as soon as this becomes available in pharmacies, I will most likely go online.”

Marks recommends that people wait at least two or three months after their last COVID or shot to acquire one of the new vaccines.

Some folks may want to wait until September or October if they are particularly worried about maximum protection during the winter surge and the holidays.

“Getting vaccinated sometime in the September to early October time frame seems like a pretty reasonable thing to do to help bring you protection through the December/January time frame,” according to Marks. “It doesn’t, like, abruptly stop. This isn’t something that ends abruptly after three or four months. It’s only that the immunity will diminish over time.”

Vaccination can help reduce the spread of COVID

“In my opinion, everyone should get one of the new vaccines,” says Dr. George Diaz, chief of medicine at Providence Regional Medical Center Everett in Everett, Wash., and an IDSA representative. “Getting vaccinated yourself will prevent transmission to others. This will help reduce the spread of the disease in the community, particularly among the most vulnerable people. So you’re not just benefiting yourself but also helping others.”

Furthermore, getting immunized lowers the likelihood of developing long-term COVID, according to Diaz.

Others dispute whether everyone needs another injection, claiming that most younger, healthy people have enough immunity from previous immunizations and infections to keep them from becoming seriously ill.

“Anyone who wants to get this vaccine should get it,” says Dr. Paul Offit, a vaccine expert from the University of Pennsylvania who advises the FDA. “It certainly makes sense why someone would want to get it because it lessens your chance of getting a mild or moderate infection for about four to six months and, to some extent, lessens your chances of spreading the virus.” However, the calculation may alter for young people. “Were I a 35-year-old healthy adult who’d already had several doses of vaccine and one or two natural infections, I wouldn’t feel compelled to get it,” Offit explains.

Regardless of public health recommendations, it is unclear how many people will seek one of the new shots. Only approximately 22% of eligible adults received one of the remaining ones.

However, anyone who wants to obtain the COVID vaccine can also get the flu shot. In addition, government officials recommend that anyone 75 and older receive one of the new vaccines to guard against the respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV. The same goes for pregnant women and adults aged 65 to 74, who are at greater risk of becoming critically ill with RSV.

Older, at-risk adults will most likely be able to receive a second dose of the new COVID vaccines in the spring or early summer to help protect them from another wave next summer.

If an insured person receives their vaccination from an in-network practitioner, they will receive all three immunizations at no cost. However, a federal program that paid for vaccinations for uninsured people has expired.

“In the public health community, we’re very concerned about how they’ll get protection, and we’re looking for solutions,” says Dr. Kelly Moore, who leads Immunize.org, an advocacy group. “We know that the people who are uninsured are the least likely to be able to afford to become ill—missing work, staying home from school.

Creating A COMPASS To Navigate Future Pandemics

Creating A COMPASS To Navigate Future Pandemics

Viruses like SARS-CoV-2 do not respect boundaries, spreading between species and continents and wreaking havoc as they go. Beating the next infection with pandemic potential requires us to improve our ability to cross borders—across fields of study, between research universities, and between scientists and the general public.

The US National Science Foundation (NSF) has announced a $18 million award to help achieve that goal. The funding brings together five universities and over 20 researchers, academics, and public health specialists to form the Virginia Tech-led Center for Community Empowering Pandemic Prediction and Prevention from Atoms to Societies (COMPASS).

Collaborators will have access to high-tech labs, data centers, and other resources at the center, which is located in the university’s interdisciplinary Data and Decision Sciences Building. However, the work will not be limited to the buildings or even the borders of Virginia Tech.

Cornell University, the University of Michigan, Meharry Medical College, and Wake Forest University will also work together to address the vital challenge of preventing infectious illnesses that endanger global society. T.M. Murali, assistant department head for research in the Department of Computer Science, will lead the new center.

The COMPASS Center is part of the $72 million NSF Predictive Intelligence for Pandemic Prevention program, which was designed to better understand how infections and diseases emerge and spread, as well as to teach the next generation of scientists to continue the work of stopping them. The initiative received two rounds of financing from the Office of the Executive Vice President and Provost, which established a Virginia Tech research priority on pandemic prediction and prevention.

“This NSF award exemplifies what can be achieved by convening an interdisciplinary team of faculty committed to advancing an area of particular strength at Virginia Tech: the development of predictive models and approaches necessary for management of infectious diseases that so often arise from the inextricable linkages between humans, animals, and the environment,” stated Executive Vice President and Provost Cyril Clarke. “Pandemic prediction and prevention is an area of scholarly emphasis selected for prioritized investment through our transdisciplinary Destination Area program.”

At a Glance

The $18 million, Virginia Tech-led COMPASS Center will

Bring together researchers and academics from all fields and organize them around one goal: knowing how a virus infects its host and what it does in the body.
include scholars from Cornell University, the University of Michigan, Meharry Medical College, and

Wake Forest University.

Focus on talking with and, most importantly, listening to the public’s needs and concerns.
Inspire and teach the next generation of scientists to advance pandemic science and improve communication with non-scientists about it.

The bulk of new human viruses come from wild and domestic animal species. “There are many challenges in trying to determine if a virus that currently infects one or more animals can jump to humans and when that leap can lead to a pandemic,” Murali informed the audience.

The center will focus on answering four major questions:

How do pathogens, such as viruses, spread from one species to another? Researchers will utilize machine learning-based predictive models to determine how changes in a pathogen may allow it to infect new species.

How does a pathogen multiply within its host? The research team will devise novel methods for creating organoids, which are miniaturized versions of organs that imitate their key activities, in order to cultivate a new virus, analyze its life cycle, and test new and existing medications and therapies on it.

What variables allow a pathogen to remain in the environment? The researchers’ goal is to develop methods for identifying the characteristics of a disease or its environment that can lead to inactivation.

How will we use the scientific information gained from this endeavor to empower the general public? Faculty and students working in COMPASS will be trained to better communicate with the public about pandemic science, and researchers will meet with the public in their community dialogues.

“What we are focusing on is really trying to understand how a pathogen or a virus can shift to a new host and how it interacts with a host at a cellular, organ, or whole body level,”

Murali told me. “Essentially, we want to discover the rules of life that govern these interactions and use that information to make the world safer.”

In the collaborators’ words

To attain the ambitious goal of understanding and predicting how viruses interact with hosts, collaborators will focus on four critical areas.

Crossing the species barrier

X.J. Meng, University Distinguished Professor of Molecular Virology at the Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, researches emerging and zoonotic viruses with veterinary and human public health implications and develops life-saving vaccinations.

“With collaborators at Cornell University and the University of Michigan, we will seek to forecast, using novel machine learning methods, which viruses may jump from animals to humans and which precise alterations within the viral genome may permit these transitions. We will also confirm the computational predictions experimentally using human organoid cells,” Meng explained. “Successful identification of genetic elements responsible for virus species jumping and adaptation will help design better prevention and control strategies against emerging viruses.”

Replicating within a host

Padma Rajagopalan, Robert E. Hord Jr Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering, and partners from Wake Forest Medical School will contribute their knowledge of the liver and other tissues and organs to the collaboration. While viruses and other diseases are extensively studied, they can be challenging to cultivate in the lab. Organoids could hold the key to gaining a better knowledge of a developing virus’s life cycle and potential countermeasures.

“We believe that 3D multicellular tissue organoids — miniature tissue models that mimic key functions of an organ—can be used to understand how viruses enter, propagate, and potentially cause damage to different organs either individually or when integrated together,” Rajagopalan told CNN. “On the other side of the equation, engineers, biologists and virologists can work together to test drugs that could be used against the virus and any complications it causes.”

Persisting in the environment and achieving university distinction. Professor Linsey Marr of the Charles Edward Via, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, along with collaborators from the University of Michigan, will investigate what allows emerging infections to thrive and survive, as well as what factors can prevent their spread.

“How long a virus survives, or persists, in the environment is an important component in its potential to propagate quickly. “If SARS-CoV-2 had not survived long in respiratory droplets, we would not have had a pandemic,” Marr added. “COMPASS will help us be able to predict whether new threats, such as the H5N1 flu virus in cows, can survive for a long time in milk or whether it would quickly die off under certain conditions.”

Empowering Scientists and the Public

Patricia Raun, an Alumni Distinguished Professor of Theatre Arts, helped establish the university’s Center for Communicating Science in 2016, which she now leads. Based on a concept devised by actor and scientific lover Alan Alda, the institute trains and educates everyone about science using artistic skills such as embodied learning, deep listening, improvisation, role play, and storytelling.

Raun and her crew will train COMPASS instructors and students in new methods to communicate with and listen to the public. This training will be provided to summer interns chosen by collaborators at Meharry Medical College.

“I believe it’s going to take all of us to solve the world’s challenging problems,” Raun told the crowd. “My part of that is around helping scientists and people in highly technical fields connect with the public and communicate with us in ways we can understand.”

The Virginia Tech faculty working with the COMPASS Center include

  1. M. Murali, Principal Investigator and Center Director

Julie Gerdes is an assistant professor of technical and professional writing and rhetoric at the College of Liberal Arts and Human Sciences.

Anuj Karpatne, associate professor of computer science at the College of Engineering, and key faculty at the Sanghani Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics

Kylene Kehn-Hall is professor of virology at the Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine and director of the Center for Emerging, Zoonotic, and Arthropod-borne Pathogens.

Lisa M. Lee is the temporary senior associate vice president for research and innovation and director of the Division of Scholarly Integrity and Research Compliance.

Linsey Marr is a University Distinguished Professor and Charles P. Lunsford Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, while X.J. Meng is a University Distinguished Professor of

Molecular Virology at Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine and an internal medicine professor at Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine.

Padma Rajagopalan is the director of the Computational Tissue Engineering Interdisciplinary Graduate Education Program and the Robert E. Hord Jr. Professor of Chemical Engineering.

Naren Ramakrishnan is a Thomas L. Phillips Professor of Engineering and director of the Sanghani Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics.

atricia Raun, an alumni Distinguished Professor of Theatre Arts and Director of the Virginia Tech Center for Communicating Science,.

Next steps:

One of the first events organized by the COMPASS Center will be a National Dialogue on the Ethics of Pandemic Research in Washington, DC, in November. The event’s purpose is to incorporate community voices and comments into pandemic-related research. Researchers and community-based partners will work together to identify critical ethical problems in pandemic science.

The center will collaborate on a variety of research projects with industry, federal agencies, and international organizations. Murali anticipates that these initiatives will result in a robust public-private ecosystem capable of addressing a wide range of pandemic scientific issues.

First Meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee About the Spike of Mpox in 2024.

First Meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee About the Spike of Mpox in 2024.

The Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), having concurred with the advice offered by the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR or Regulations) Emergency Committee regarding the upsurge of mpox 2024 during its first meeting, held on 14, 2024, has determined, on the same date, that the ongoing upsurge of mpox in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and in a growing number of countries in Africa constitutes a public health emergency The Director-General’s communication regarding the finding of the aforementioned PHEIC on August 14, 2024, is available here.

The Director-General hereby transmits the report of the first meeting of the IHR Emergency Committee on the rise of MPX 2024.

Noting that the Director-General will communicate to States Parties a 12-month extension of the current standing recommendations for mpox, the Director-General’s temporary recommendations for the PHEIC associated with the ongoing mpox outbreak are presented in the final section of this statement and reflect the Committee’s advice.

The Director-General is taking this opportunity to convey his heartfelt appreciation to the Chair, Vice-Chair, and Members of the IHR Emergency Committee, as well as its Advisors.

Meeting Proceedings

The Emergency Committee’s sixteen (16) members and two (2) advisors met by Zoom teleconference on Wednesday, August 14, 2024, from 12:00 to 17:00 CEST. The meeting was attended by fifteen (15) of the Committee’s 16 members, as well as two (2) of its advisors.

The Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO) attended in person and welcomed the participants. The Director-General’s opening remarks are accessible here.


The Representative of the Office of Legal Counsel addressed the Members and Advisers on their respective roles and obligations, as well as the Emergency Committee’s mandate under the relevant IHR articles. The Ethics Officer from the Department of Compliance, Risk Management, and Ethics gave Members and Advisors an overview of the WHO Declaration of Interests process. Members and Advisors were made aware of their individual responsibility to promptly disclose to WHO any personal, professional, financial, intellectual, or commercial interests that could result in a perceived or actual conflict of interest.

They were also reminded of the need to keep meeting topics and committee work confidential. Each Member and Advisor was surveyed, and no conflicts of interest were detected.

The Representative from the Office of Legal Counsel then facilitated the election of Committee officers in accordance with the Emergency Committee’s norms of procedure and working methods. Professor Dimie Ogoina was elected Chair of the Committee, Professor Inger Damon Vice-Chair, and Professor Lucille Helen Blumberg Rapporteur, all by acclamation.

The meeting was handed over to the Chair, who explained the meeting’s objectives, which were to provide feedback to the Director-General on whether the event constitutes a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) and, if so, feedback on potential temporary recommendations.

Session open for representatives of States Parties invited to offer their views

The WHO Secretariat provided an assessment of the global mpox epidemiological situation, stressing that, during the first six months of 2024, the 1854 confirmed mpox cases reported by States Parties in the WHO African Region accounted for 36% (1854/5199) of the cases observed worldwide. Of these confirmed cases in the WHO African region in 2024, 95% (1754/1854) were reported in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), which is experiencing an increase in mpox cases, with more than 15,000 clinically compatible cases and over 500 deaths reported, already surpassing the number of cases observed in the DRC in 2023.

The increase in mpox cases in the DRC is being driven by outbreaks related with two sub-clades of clade I monkeypox virus (MPXV): clade Ia and clade Ib. Clade I mpox was typically reported in WHO research done in the 1980s as having a fatality rate of around 10%, with the majority of deaths occurring in youngsters.

MPXV clade Ia is endemic in the Democratic Republic of the Congo; the disease primarily affects children; data for 2024 show an aggregated case fatality rate of 3.6%; and the spread is likely sustained through multiple modes of transmission, including person-to-person transmission following zoonotic introduction into a community.

MPXV clade Ib is a novel strain of MPXV that has developed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and is spreading among humans, most likely through sexual contact, in the country’s east. Although it was initially identified in 2024, estimations suggest it appeared about September 2023. The clade Ib outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo mostly affects adults and is expanding rapidly, owing to transmission connected to sexual contact and amplified in networks associated with commercial sex and sex workers.

Since July 2024, instances of mpox caused by MPXV clade Ib, which is epidemiologically and phylogenetically connected to the outbreak in the DRC’s eastern provinces, have been found in four neighboring countries that had not previously reported occurrences of mpox: Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, and Uganda.

In 2024, instances of mpox connected to MPXV clade Ia were reported in the Central African Republic and the Republic of Congo, while cases linked to MPXV clade II were documented in Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Liberia, Nigeria, and South Africa.

The clinical presentation of mpox associated with MPXV clade Ia has traditionally been more severe than that associated with MPXV clade II. Clade IIb viruses circulated during the multi-country outbreak that served as a PHEIC from July 2022 to May 2023. There is currently inadequate information available to accurately assess mpox severity related to clade Ib, as data are emerging and few deaths have been recorded, precluding age-stratified analysis.

The secretariat emphasized difficulty in identifying the true level of infection, epidemiologic patterns, and morbidity and death, cautioning against overinterpreting available data to determine crude CFRs by clade/outbreak.


The assessed risk presented by the WHO Secretariat, grouping geographical areas as a result of the assessment of population groups affected, predominant modes of transmission, and MPXV clades involved, was: “high” for eastern DRC and neighbouring countries; “high” for areas of the DRC where mpox is known to be endemic; “moderate” for Nigeria and countries of West, Central, and East Africa where mpox is endemic; and “moderate” for other countries in Africa and around the

The WHO Secretariat also offered an assessment of the activities previously taken to enhance readiness and response initiatives in States Parties experiencing an increase in cases of mpox and at risk. These include, among other things, the release of USD 1.45 million from the WHO Contingency Fund for Emergencies; the start of the process of including two mpox vaccines on the Emergency Use Listing; coordination with partners and stakeholders, including to facilitate equitable access to vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics; and the development of a regional response plan, which will cost an initial USD 15 million.


Representatives from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya, Rwanda, South Africa, and Uganda provided the Committee with an update on their respective countries’ mpox epidemic condition, as well as current response efforts, requirements, and problems. Although most countries reported few cases of MPXV-clade Ib-related mpox, Burundi has reported one hundred confirmed cases of mpox connected with clade Ib since July 2024, detected in different districts, with 28% of cases involving children under the age of five years.

The Committee’s members and advisors then engaged in question-and-answer sessions with the presenters. The inquiries and debates centered on the issues and concerns listed below:

The observed complicated and dynamic evolution of the various outbreaks that are driving the upsurge of mpox, as well as its international dissemination, in the DRC and neighboring countries. Elements supporting such observations and suggesting causes for concern include:

Scientific uncertainties and evidence gaps (e.g., role of ecological changes in mpox spread, modes of disease transmission, transmission dynamics, risk factors, disease severity and case fatality rate associated with different MPXV clades, pregnancy outcome in women infected with different MPXV clades);

Adequacy of capacities, recognizing capacities gained during COVID-19 and their heterogeneity across States Parties for surveillance, diagnostic capacities, surveillance modalities at borders, access to clinical care, integration of HIV/STI services in prevention and treatment, risk communication and community engagement, vaccination delivery, and other capacities to support prevention, readiness, and response activities;

Lack of complete understanding of the geographical spread and detailed epidemiology of dynamic mpox outbreaks, including molecular epidemiology, to optimize targeted prevention and control measures, including risk communication and community engagement with local partners to enable appropriate support and behavior modifications, as well as the targeted use of mpox vaccines in at-risk groups;

Availability and availability to laboratory assays that can be performed in demanding situations, as well as methods to identify between circulating MPXV clades. and

An incomplete mapping of mpox-related research and development efforts underway, including many initiatives underway, including a WHO and Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) consultation scheduled for August 2024;

Unpredictability and a lack of financial resources at both national and international levels to scale up and sustain actions to prevent and control the spread of mpox, despite the preparation of costed global, regional, and national response plans;

need-based access to mpox vaccines, given the current global shortage; the vaccine’s current limited production, contingent on orders placed with the manufacturer; and the lengthy time required to develop legal agreements for mpox vaccine donation rather than direct procurement. Regarding access to vaccinations, the WHO Secretariat informed the Committee of its continued engagement with multiple partners under the interim coordination framework for medical countermeasures. (i-MCM-Net), including Gavi and the United Nations Children’s Fund, on coordinating the donation and allocation process in an equitable, needs-based manner;
Access to the antiviral medicine tecovirimat, given that both the minimum amount required to make an order with the manufacturer and the product’s price pose significant hurdles for many States Parties,. While data is being gathered on its usage in the treatment of cases of mpox, it can be accessible under the procedure for Monitored Emergency usage of Unregistered and

Experimental Interventions (MEURI);

The need for reporting on how States Parties are implementing the standing recommendation for mpox released on August 21, 2023.

Deliberative session

Following the open session for invited States Parties, the Committee reconvened in a closed session to consider the questions of whether the event is a PHEIC or not, and if so, to consider the temporary recommendations drafted by the WHO Secretariat in accordance with IHR provisions.

The Chair reminded the Committee Members of their duty and recalled that a PHEIC is described in the IHR as “an extraordinary event, which constitutes a public health risk to other States through the international spread of disease, and potentially requires a coordinated international response.”

The Committee unanimously agreed that the ongoing outbreak of mpox fits the criteria for a PHEIC and that the Director-General be notified appropriately.

The Committee’s unanimous views were supported by further observations on concerns and challenges raised during the question and answer session.

The Committee considered the event to be “extraordinary” because of

(a) the increase in mpox clade I disease occurrence in the DRC and the emergence of the new MPXV clade Ib, the human-to-human transmission context in which it is occurring, its rapid spread in some settings, and available evidence suggesting that MPXV clade I is associated with a more severe clinical presentation than MPXV clade II;

(b) the diverse The complex, dynamic, and rapidly evolving epidemiology observed across States Parties in the WHO African Region in terms of: overall rapid increase of the number of cases reported in some settings, differences in population age-groups affected, routes and modes sustaining transmissions in different contexts;

 (c) the severity of the clinical presentation in children and immunocompromised individuals, including people living with uncontrolled HIV infection or advanced HIV

Furthermore, the Committee emphasized that its level of concern is further heightened by

(a) uncertainties and gaps in knowledge and evidence related to

(i) multiple epidemiological aspects, including drivers of transmission, morbidity, and mortality associated with infections with different MPXV sub-clades;

(ii) the incompleteness and uncertainties of available epidemiological data and considered by the Committee, due to the limitations of current surveillance.DRC is experiencing an increase in mpox, which impedes the implementation of control measures;

(iii) the impact of control measures, including the targeted use of vaccines and their overall effectiveness;

 (b) the risk of the emergence and spread of additional MPXV clade I and clade II mutations in the context of limited capacity to implement control measures.


The Committee considered that the event “constitutes a public health risk to other States through the international spread of disease” because of

 (a) the documented recent spread of MPXV clade Ib from eastern DRC to Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, and Uganda;

(b) the limited capacity to control transmission in endemic situations and in areas of upsurge through enhanced surveillance enabling the implementation of targeted response interventions that are eventually subordinated to The i-MCM-Net has also been activated for mpox. In light of the Africa CDC’s declaration of the event as a Public Health Emergency of Continental Security on August 13, 2024, the Committee concluded that international cooperation must be strengthened and coordinated, particularly in terms of

(a) facilitating equitable access to vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics,

(b) mobilizing financial resources.

The Committee then evaluated the text of temporary recommendations offered by the WHO Secretariat, which was briefly presented during the meeting. The committee stated that it would continue to review the proposed temporary recommendations while finalizing the meeting report.

The Committee noted that, in his opening remarks, the Director-General announced a 12-month extension of the current standing recommendations for mpox, which were slated to expire on August 20, 2024. The Committee also noted that, if the Director-General determines that the mpox outbreak constitutes a PHEIC, it would be the first time since the Regulations went into effect that temporary and standing recommendations to States Parties on the same public health risk would coexist.

As a result, the Committee emphasized that any temporary proposal given by the Director-General should be very particular and targeted and thus not duplicate the standing recommendations.

Although both temporary and standing recommendations are non-binding advice to States Parties, the Committee recommended that mechanisms for monitoring the uptake, implementation, and impact of such recommendations be included in the set of temporary recommendations to States Parties that the Director-General may issue in relation to the event under consideration.

Conclusions

The Committee reiterated its concern about the evolution of the multifaceted mpox outbreak, including the many uncertainties surrounding it and the capacities in place to control the spread of mpox in States Parties experiencing outbreaks or in States Parties that may be forced to do so as a result of additional international spread.

The Committee recognized the importance of coordinated international cooperation in assisting States Parties’ efforts to control the spread of mpox in the WHO African Region, including facilitating access to and use of vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics; mobilizing financial resources for States Parties experiencing disease outbreaks; and synergistic initiatives by WHO and partners, including Africa CDC.

Nonetheless, the Committee stated that the development of strategic ways to help States Parties become more self-sufficient in preventing the spread of mumps is necessary. To that end, the Committee believes that the Director-General’s finding that the mpox outbreak is a PHEIC will encourage States Parties confronting outbreaks to more effectively commit and deploy domestic resources.

Temporary recommendations given by the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO) to States Parties regarding the public health emergency of international concern associated with the outbreak of mpox.

These temporary recommendations are offered to States Parties suffering an increase in mpox, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, and Uganda.

They are meant to be implemented by those States Parties in addition to the current standing recommendations for mpox, which will be extended until August 20, 2025 and are included at the end of this paper for easy reference.

The aforementioned standing guidelines apply to all States Parties in the context of global efforts to prevent and control the spread of mpox illness, as stated in the WHO Strategic Framework for strengthening mpox prevention and control 2024–2027.


All current WHO interim technical guidance is available on this page of the WHO website. WHO evidence-based guidance has been and will continue to be revised to reflect the changing situation, new scientific evidence, and WHO risk assessment to assist States Parties in implementing the WHO Strategic Framework for improving mpox prevention and control.

According to Article 3 Principle of the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR), States Parties must implement these temporary recommendations, as well as the standing recommendations for mpox, with full respect for the dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms of individuals, in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 3 of the IHR.

Emergency Coordination

Establish or improve national and local emergency response coordination arrangements.
Establish or improve the coordination of all partners and stakeholders involved in or supporting response actions through cooperation, including the introduction of accountability systems.
Engage partner groups for collaboration and support, including humanitarian players in contexts of insecurity, locations with internal or refugee population displacements, and hosting communities vulnerable areas.

Collaborative Surveillance and Lab Diagnostics

Improve surveillance by enhancing the sensitivity of methodologies used and ensuring wide geographical coverage.

Increase access to accurate, inexpensive, and available diagnostics to discriminate monkeypox viral clades, especially by increasing arrangements for sample transit, decentralization of diagnostics, and arrangements for genomic sequencing;

Identify, monitor, and support the contacts of people with mpox to avoid further transmission;
Increase efforts to thoroughly examine instances and outbreaks of mpox illness in order to clarify the ways of transmission and prevent its spread to household members and communities.
Report suspected, probable, and confirmed mpox cases to WHO in a timely and weekly basis;

Safe and Scalable Clinical Care

Provide clinical, nutritional, and psychosocial support for patients with mpox, including, when warranted and possible, isolation in care facilities and guidance for home-based care.

Develop and implement a strategy to increase access to optimal supportive clinical treatment for all mpox patients, particularly children, HIV patients, and pregnant women. This includes offering HIV tests to adult patients who do not know their HIV status and to children as appropriate, with links to HIV treatment and care services when indicated; the prompt identification and effective management of endemic co-infections, such as malaria, varicella zoster, and measles viruses, as well as other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among cases linked to sexual contact;

Strengthen health and care workers’ capacity, knowledge, and abilities in the clinical and infection prevention and control pathways, from diagnosis to discharge of patients with suspected and confirmed mpox, and provide them with personal protective equipment;
Promote and implement infection prevention and control measures, as well as basic water and sanitation services, in health care institutions, households, congregate settings (e.g., prisons, internally displaced persons and refugee camps, schools, etc.), and cross-border transit zones.
International traffic

Establish or strengthen cross-border collaboration arrangements for surveillance and management of suspected mpox cases, as well as the provision of information to travelers and conveyance operators, without resorting to general travel and trade restrictions that unnecessarily impact local, regional, or national economies;

Vaccination

Prepare for the introduction of the mpox vaccine for emergency response by assembling national immunization technical advisory groups, briefing national regulatory authorities, and developing national policy frameworks to apply for vaccines through existing mechanisms.
Initiate plans to advance mpox vaccination activities in areas with incident cases (i.e., disease onset within the previous 2-4 weeks), focusing on people at high risk of infection (e.g., contacts of cases, including sexual contacts, children, and health and health-care workers). This requires the rapid adaptation of immunization strategies and plans to concerned locations, the availability of vaccines and supplies, and proactive community engagement to develop and sustain demand for and trust in vaccination. and data gathering during immunization in accordance with implementable study methods.

Risk communication and community involvement

Improve risk communication and community engagement systems with affected communities and local workforces to support outbreak prevention, response, and vaccination strategies, such as through training, mapping high-risk and vulnerable populations, social listening and community feedback, and managing misinformation. This entails, among other things, effectively communicating the uncertainties regarding the natural history of mpox, updating information about mpox, including information from ongoing clinical trials, the efficacy of mpox vaccines, and the uncertainties regarding the duration of protection following vaccination;
Address stigma and discrimination in any form through meaningful community engagement, particularly in health care and risk communication programs;

Governance and Finance

Galvanize and scale up national funding, and investigate external opportunities for targeted support of prevention, readiness, and response efforts.
Integrate mpox prevention and response measures into existing programs aimed at preventing, controlling, and treating other endemic diseases—especially HIV, as well as STIs, malaria, tuberculosis, and COVID-19, as well as noncommunicable diseases—with the goal of not negatively impacting their delivery.

Addressing Research Gaps

Invest in addressing knowledge gaps and generating evidence, during and after outbreaks, regarding the dynamics of mpox transmission, risk factors, the social and behavioral drivers of transmission, the natural history of disease, through trials for novel therapeutics and vaccines against mpox, the effectiveness of public health interventions, with a One Health approach.

Report on the implementation of temporary suggestions.

Report to WHO quarterly on the status and obstacles associated with the implementation of these temporary guidelines, using a standardized tool and channels made available by WHO.
The Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO) has issued standing recommendations for mpox in accordance with the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR). States Parties should develop and implement national mpox plans based on WHO strategic and technical guidance, outlining critical actions to sustain control and eliminate human-to-human transmission in all contexts through coordinated and integrated policies. Actions are advised for:

Incorporate lessons learnt from response evaluations (such as intra- or after-action assessments) into relevant plans and policies to sustain, adapt, and promote essential components of the response, as well as educate public health policies and programs.
Aim to eliminate human-to-human transmission of mpox by anticipating, detecting, planning for, and responding to outbreaks, as well as taking appropriate steps to limit zoonotic transmission.
Build and maintain capacity in resource-constrained contexts and among marginalized people where mpox transmission persists to better understand transmission patterns, quantify resource requirements, and detect and respond to outbreaks and community transmissions.

States As a fundamental foundation for the actions listed in A to support the eradication target, parties are advised to create and maintain laboratory-based surveillance and diagnostic capacities to improve epidemic detection and risk assessment. Actions are advised for:

4. Make mumps a notifiable disease in the national epidemiological monitoring system.

5. Improve diagnostic capacity across the healthcare system for laboratory and point-of-care confirmation of cases.

6. Follow WHO guidelines and use the Case Reporting Form to report confirmed cases with a recent international travel history.

7. Collaborate with other countries to make genome sequencing available or accessible to all countries. Share genetic sequencing data and metadata in public databases.

8. Notify WHO of significant MPOC-related events via IHR channels.

C. States Parties are advised to improve community protection by increasing capacity for risk communication and community engagement, tailoring public health and social measures to local contexts, and continuing to strive for equity and building trust with communities through the following actions, particularly for those most vulnerable. Actions are advised for:

9. Work with health authorities and civil society to communicate danger, raise awareness, and engage affected communities and at-risk groups.

10. Implement initiatives to reduce stigma and discrimination against any persons or groups who may be impacted by mpox.

D. States. Parties are encouraged to initiate, maintain, support, and collaborate on research to provide evidence for mpox prevention and control, with the goal of eliminating human-to-human transmission of mpox. Actions are advised for:

11. Contribute to the global research agenda by generating and disseminating knowledge on essential scientific, social, clinical, and public health aspects of polio transmission, prevention, and control.

12. Conduct clinical studies for medical countermeasures, such as diagnostics, vaccinations, and medicines, in various populations to assess safety, efficacy, and duration of protection.

13. States Parties in West, Central, and East Africa shall further investigate the risk, vulnerability, and impact of polio, taking into account various modes of transmission in different demographics.

E. States Parties are advised to implement the following precautions regarding international travel:. Actions are advised for:

14. Encourage authorities, health care providers, and community groups to equip travelers with important information about how to protect themselves and others before, during, and after attending activities or gatherings when mpox is a danger.

15. Advise anyone suspected or known to have mpox, or who may be a contact in a case, to take precautions to avoid exposing others, including when traveling internationally.

16. Avoid establishing mpox-specific travel health measures such as entry or exit screening, as well as testing or vaccine restrictions.

States Parties are encouraged to provide guidance and coordinate resources to ensure optimally integrated clinical care for mpox, including access to specific treatment and protective measures for health workers and caregivers as needed. States Parties are encouraged to take initiatives like:

17. Provide optimal clinical care, including infection prevention and control strategies, for suspected and confirmed mumps in all clinical settings. Ensure that health care providers receive appropriate training and personal protective equipment.


18. Integrate mpox detection, prevention, care, and research into HIV and sexually transmitted illness prevention and control programs, as well as other health services, as needed.

States Parties are encouraged to cooperate together to provide equitable access to safe, effective, and quality-assured mpox countermeasures, including resource mobilization methods. States Parties are encouraged to take action towards:

19. Improve access to diagnostics, genomic sequencing, vaccines, and therapeutics for affected communities, particularly in resource-constrained settings where mpox occurs frequently. This includes men who have sex with men and groups at risk of heterosexual transmission, with a focus on marginalized groups.

20. Make mpox vaccines available for primary prevention (pre-exposure) and post-exposure immunization for mpox-prone individuals and communities, in accordance with WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) recommendations.

Approximately Half Of TikTok Users Under 30 Say They Use It To Keep Up With Politics And News

Approximately Half Of TikTok Users Under 30 Say They Use It To Keep Up With Politics And News

TikTok has become so popular among young Americans that presidential campaigns are utilizing it for voter outreach. According to a March Pew Research Center survey, some young folks use TikTok to stay informed about politics and news.

Our survey looked at several reasons why people would use TikTok and other social media sites. Young TikTok users differ from their older colleagues for various reasons, including:

Keeping up with current political events or topics: For 48% of TikTok users aged 18 to 29, this is a key or minor reason why they utilize the app.

In comparison, 36% of those aged 30 to 49, and even smaller proportions of older users, say the same:

22% of those 50–64

24% of those 65 or older

Getting the news. We also questioned TikTok users about whether receiving news in general is a reason they utilize the platform, whether it’s political news or something else entirely. Approximately half of individuals under the age of 30 say they use TikTok for news, whether it is significant or trivial.

In contrast, 41% of TikTok users aged 30 to 49 say they use it to get news. The percentage of senior users stating so is even lower.

29% of those 50–64

23% of those 65 or older

TikTok has grown in popularity as a news source, defying other social media platforms. According to a 2023 Center study, more Americans, particularly young Americans, acquire their news from the platform on a regular basis than they did a few years ago.

For additional information on what inspires TikTok use, such as entertainment, which is a big pull for the majority of TikTok users, check out our in-depth look at why and how people use the platform.

What users view and share on TikTok


A bar chart shows that TikTok users under 30 are more likely than those 50 and older to report seeing political content.

Almost half of all TikTok users (45%) report seeing at least some content on politics or political problems on the app. This includes 6% of users who claim to see only or mostly political stuff.

As with other sites we’ve researched, substantially fewer people post about politics than see political content on TikTok. Approximately one-tenth of individuals aged 18 to 29 (7%), 30 to 49 (8%), and 50 to 64 (8%) submit political content there. That contrasts to only 2% of TikTok users aged 65 and up.

However, many people (63%) do not publish anything at all


Only 36% of TikTok users report ever posting or sharing on the platform. Users aged 30 to 49 are the most likely to think this, at 44%. This contrasts to 37% of those aged 18 to 29, 26% of those aged 50 to 64, and 15% of those aged 65 and up.

Seeing news-related content

A bar chart shows that TikTok users under the age of 30 are more likely to see breaking news and perspectives on current events.

Regardless of whether TikTok users claim getting news is a reason they’re there, the majority perceive humor and opinions about news on the platform.

84% of TikTok users have seen funny posts referencing current events.

80% see people sharing their opinions about current events.

57% of news stories are shared, reposted, linked, or screenshotted, while 55% are aware of breaking news events as they occur.

Users under 50 are more likely than older users to report having seen each of these.

TikTok users under the age of 30 are more likely to share their thoughts on current events and breaking news. They are more likely than any other age group to have encountered these two types of information.

TikTok and Democracy

Debates about TikTok’s impact on the political atmosphere in the United States, particularly among young voters, have received national attention. We sought to understand: How do TikTok users perceive the platform’s impact on democracy?

Overall, TikTok users are about twice as likely to believe it is largely positive for American democracy as it is negative (33% vs. 17%). But the majority of users (49%) believe it has little impact on democracy.

TikTok users under 30 are more positive, with 45% saying it’s mostly good for democracy. That compares to:
30% of users are aged 30 to 49.

23% of users 50–64

15% of users are 65 and older.

Even among users under 30, 39% believe the platform has no impact on democracy. That figure rises to 66% among users aged 65 and up.

The March study indicated only minimal differences in TikTok users’ views on the platform’s impact on democracy based on political party affiliation. Still, as lawmakers strive to ban TikTok for national security concerns, other Center research has indicated that public opinion on the platform’s ban is sharply divided by political party.

Read these companion reports to find out how Americans see and interact with TikTok, X (previously

Twitter), Facebook, and Instagram:

How Americans Navigate Politics on TikTok, X, Facebook, and Instagram.

How Americans Receive News on TikTok, X, Facebook, and Instagram
These Pew Research Center publications and analyses are part of the Pew-Knight Initiative, a research program co-funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.

MIT Study Shows Why Laws Are Constructed In An Unintelligible Way

MIT Study Shows Why Laws Are Constructed In An Unintelligible Way

Even lawyers struggle to grasp legal paperwork. This raises the question of why these materials are prepared in such an opaque format.

MIT cognitive scientists believe they have found an answer to that issue. They argue that, just as “magic spells” use peculiar rhymes and antiquated phrases to communicate their power, legalese’s complicated vocabulary conveys a sense of authority.

In a study published this week in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers discovered that even non-lawyers utilize this style of language when asked to write legislation.

“People seem to understand that there’s an implicit rule that this is how laws should sound, and they write them that way,” says Edward Gibson, an MIT professor of brain and cognitive sciences and the study’s senior author.

The study’s principal author is Eric Martinez, PhD ’24. Francis Mollica, a lecturer at the University of Melbourne, also contributed to the study.

Cast a legitimate spell

Gibson’s research group has been exploring the specific properties of legalese since 2020, when Martinez joined MIT after graduating from Harvard Law School. In a 2022 study, Gibson, Martinez, and Mollica examined about 3.5 million words of legal contracts and compared them to other genres of writing such as movie scripts, newspaper pieces, and academic papers.

That research indicated that extended definitions are commonly added in the middle of sentences in legal papers, a phenomenon known as “center-embedding.” Linguists have previously discovered that this type of organization can make literature significantly more difficult to interpret.

“Legalese somehow has developed this tendency to put structures inside other structures, in a way which is not typical of human languages,” according to Gibson.

In a subsequent study released in 2023, the researchers discovered that legalese made documents more difficult for lawyers to interpret. Lawyers preferred plain English versions of documents, which they evaluated as equally enforceable as traditional legal paperwork.

“Lawyers also find legalese to be unwieldy and complicated,” observes Gibson. “Lawyers don’t like it, laypeople don’t like it, so the point of this current paper was to try and figure out why they write documents this way.”

The researchers proposed a handful of theories regarding why legalese is so common. One was the “copy and edit hypothesis,” which proposes that legal texts start with a simple premise and then add information and meanings to existing sentences, resulting in complicated center-embedded clauses.

“We thought it was plausible that you would start with a simple initial draft and then later consider all of the other conditions that you want to include.” And the notion is that once you’ve started, it’ll be much easier to integrate it into the current provision,” adds Martinez, who is now a fellow and instructor at the University of Chicago Law School.

However, the findings ultimately pointed to a different idea, known as the “magic spell hypothesis.” According to the researchers, the complicated form of legal language appears to signify a specific kind of authority, similar to how magic spells are written in a distinct style that distinguishes them from ordinary English.

“In English culture, if you want to write a magic spell, people know that the method to do so is to use a lot of old-fashioned rhymes. “We believe center-embedding is signaling legalese in the same way,” Gibson explains.l.

In this study, the researchers asked approximately 200 non-lawyers (native English speakers living in the United States who were recruited using a crowdsourcing site called Prolific) to compose two sorts of writings. The first duty required participants to design rules outlawing crimes including drunk driving, burglary, arson, and drug trafficking. In the second exercise, participants were instructed to compose stories about the crimes.

To test the copy and edit hypothesis, half of the participants were invited to provide extra material after writing their initial law or story. The researchers discovered that all of the participants drafted laws with center-embedded provisions, whether they wrote the legislation all at once or were instructed to write a draft and then add to it later. And when students wrote stories about those laws, they used far simpler English, regardless of whether they needed to add material afterward.

“When making laws, they used a lot of center-embedding whether they had to modify it or write it from scratch. Martinez adds that they did not apply center-embedding in either case in the narrative text.

In another set of trials, approximately 80 volunteers were instructed to draft laws as well as summaries of those laws for visitors from different countries. Participants in these tests employed center-embedding for their laws, but not for their descriptions.

The Origins of Legalese

Gibson’s laboratory is currently exploring the origins of center-embedding in legal texts. Because early American laws were founded on British law, the researchers intend to examine British laws to discover if they use similar grammatical constructions. Going back even further, they intend to investigate whether center-embedding may be discovered in the Hammurabi Code, the earliest known body of rules, which dates from around 1750 BC.

“There may be just a stylistic way of writing from back then, and if it was seen as successful, people would use that style in other languages,” according to Gibson. “I would guess that it’s an accidental property of how the laws were written the first time, but we don’t know that yet.”

The researchers believe that their findings, which identify specific characteristics of legal language that make it difficult to understand, would encourage policymakers to try to make laws more understandable. Efforts to produce legal papers in plainer language go back at least to the 1970s, when President Richard Nixon declared that federal regulations should be written in “layman’s terms.” However, there has been minimal change in legal wording since then.

“We have learned only very recently what it is that makes legal language so complicated, and therefore I am optimistic about being able to change it,” Gibson tells me.

London Over The Centuries Inspired Civilization VII

Fans of Civilization have been waiting nearly a decade for the latest installment in the legendary video game franchise.

Now it has been discovered that the concept of time passing is rather appropriate: the idea behind Civilization VII, which will be launched in February, is how the UK capital has changed from the Roman era to the present.
It all began with a map of London, as the Romans knew it.

Londinium looked like pretty much any frontier Roman town, with an amphitheatre, baths, and a shaky bridge that crossed to the south side of the Thames,” said the game’s main developer, Ed Beach, as he showed me the map below, which is courtesy of Encyclopaedia Britannica.
“But I wanted to look at how this evolved and how this changed as London grew and prospered.”
The new game will be built around the lessons learned from those changes.

Since its inception in 1991, the Civilization series has sold 70 million copies; the most recent version was released in 2016.

Fans have been wondering where developers Firaxis will take the game’s next update.
I belong to that cohort; my brother introduced me to Civ II on our PlayStation in the 1990s, and I was just mildly startled to realize that I’ve spent more than 500 hours playing the sixth iteration of the game.

For those who are unfamiliar, civilization can feel more like a board game than a video game. You move forces around a map, establishing and building cities while fighting others to claim their land.

Previous games in the series required players to play as a specific leader and civilization combination, such as Teddy Roosevelt and the United States or Cleopatra and Egypt.

However, the developers argue that this is not genuinely typical of how cities evolve, as multiple ruling factions leave their mark, as they have in London.

In the new game, a player can start as the Romans and develop their own Londinium during the Antiquity era.

However, after going to the next level, known as the exploration era in the game, players may become Normans and build on what has come before.

The game’s developers were inspired by Ludgate, the site of the west gate on the former London Wall, and dug out additional old maps to examine how the area had changed 1,000 years after the Romans departed London.

“London changes, and it grows, but you can see that core Roman encampment,” Mr. Beach said.

The map, created by Layers of London, a division of the UK’s Institute of Historical Research, shows that the River Fleet still runs, but many of the Roman-era buildings are no longer present.
“It’s all been built over by the buildings that you would expect in a medieval or Renaissance-era city,” Mr. Beach added.

“We have inns, we have taverns, we still have religious buildings to the east side of the wall, but it’s now St Paul’s Cathedral, the very first version of it, before it got burned in the Fire of London.”And we notice that the river has been redirected somewhat so that they may build a prison to house some of the miscreants from the Middle Ages and keep them at bay.”

This distinction served as the cornerstone for the new game, with each era building on the previous one.

Finally, the developers traveled back in time to the Victorian era to see how the Ludgate neighbourhood had evolved once more.

This image, reproduced with permission from the National Library of Scotland, depicts another notable set of alterations, with the River Fleet no longer visible after being redirected underground for sewage in the mid-1800s.

“Now that the prison is totally replaced, the needs of the industrial revolution dictate we need a rail line in there, and Ludgate rail station is exactly on top of where the prison used to be,” Mr. Beach explained.

“All those buildings that used to support religious activity have pretty much been overtaken, except for St. Paul’s Cathedral.”

This third stage of transition, which the new game refers to as the contemporary era, helped the developers solidify their notion.

In London, for example, players could play as the Romans, then the Normans, and finally as Britain, all while creating a rising England that extends beyond the capital city.

Wishlist of Changes

While the dramatic change in style may be exhilarating for some, die-hard fans of the series may be apprehensive about how different it is.

It comes amid a slew of other improvements that will be meaningful to aficionados but may not make much sense to those who haven’t played the game before.

The game’s developers tell me that computer-controlled civilisations will behave more wisely. They tick off the seemingly infinite changes like a checklist: each civilization has its own distinct set of civics to uncover, units may now move across rivers, and there are no more builders.
There are expected modifications, such as a graphics upgrade to make the game more modern, as well as surprising ones, such as changing the leaders you play to include notable historical individuals who did not rule their countries, such as Benjamin Franklin and Confucius.
Meanwhile, Hatshepsut, one of Egypt’s legendary female rulers, is now playable. The game’s narrator, Game of Thrones and Star Wars actress Gwendoline Christie, adds weight to the visual enhancement.

However, not everything was pulled directly from a fan’s request.

Traders will continue to build roads automatically, which has long been a source of frustration for some gamers. The game’s approach to religion has changed slightly, but it still appears that players will be micromanaging missionaries around the continent.
And large promises to cure the AI are well accepted, but without seeing the finished product, it’s difficult to be convinced.

Moving between ages appears to be linked to crises such as barbarian invasions, civil wars, and plagues, though the specific mechanism is unknown.

Mr Beach stated that it creates a “cool cycle that you go through three times in the game that we’re releasing here at launch,” which I told him sounded suspiciously like Firaxis would consider adding more cycles and empires in the future.

He would not be drawn to it

But one thing is certain: with what amounts to a large reset button between eras, no single player will be able to blitz ahead and gain an unbeatable lead at the start of each game, which will be music to fans’ ears.
We will find out when the game is out next year.